Count St. Germain
Triangle Book & Dragon Treasures
Videos by Iona Miller, 2010-2014
Sites
Facts - http://trianglebook.weebly.com
Fiction - http://thecountmovie.weebly.com
Facts - http://trianglebook.weebly.com
Fiction - http://thecountmovie.weebly.com
St. Germain Novel Film: http://thecountmovie.weebly.com
Articles
trianglebook.weebly.com
Video
http://www.vimeo.com/album/242933
7 videos in this album - http://www.vimeo.com/album/242933 trianglebook.iwarp.com
Find out about the Dragon lineage, Deep Time, Dragon Precession and 2012, long hidden secrets and the nature of Immortality. The Dragon is the symbolic superstar of Saint Germain's secret grimoire. Find out why and what it means. St. Germain had The Secret, a legacy of Manly Palmer Hall and his Philosophical Research Society (PRS). It was the supreme treasure of his vault. It now resides in the Getty Research Institute, likewise deep in their library vaults. Revealed here are unseen photos of the sigils, emblems and ciphers of the book.
This master adept, called the wisest in Europe, reserved his greatest gift, the two books he wrote, for his wisest companions. St. Germaine recorded his version of The Secret to health, wealth and long life in his legendary TRIANGLE BOOK, and apparently made copies for his closest circle of initiates. But, perhaps even then, the entire secret was never entrusted to a single individual, as the copies of the book are not identical, containing different illustrations.
We might deduce that to properly work the formulae in the book, one required the Emblems and Sigils it described. Is this why Manly Palmer Hall possessed two copies of the book, each with different glyphs? It begs the point, were there other copies with even more illustrations required to initiate the whole current -- to attain magical immortality?
The TRIANGLE BOOK (or Triangular Book) differs from many alchemical texts in its language, being more of a ritual invocation than a recipe. Naturally, St. Germain made marvelous plant and herbal medicines (spagyrics) but this book is not about that but about the qualitative Universal Medicine. Meditation is required for all spiritual pursuits, including alchemy, qabalah and magic.
What we know is that both St. Germain and Manly Palmer Hall lived to a ripe old age and remained mentally vibrant, each a great adept of his own era. Can this obscure arcane text -- one of the rarest occult manuscripts -- be the secret of their longevity? The book is alleged to be Egyptian in origin. MPH, himself, can be seen with the book in the frontpiece portrait in his FREEMASONRY OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS.
Here, for possibly the first time ever, the text translation appears with the withheld 5 illustrations of the two copies. Even in the originals, it is difficult to make out the precise glyphs of the sigils, but arguably their magical potency is intact. Sigils and emblems often contain hidden meanings, since they are a visual shorthand which can be "read" for their symbolism. Carl Jung used this method as the traditional basis of his alchemically inspired psychology.
SAVING THE WORLD SOUL
Who is St. Germain?
Here There Be Dragons, by Iona Miller
WHO WAS ST. GERMAIN?
The following is offered as suggestion rather than proof:
Among the legends of his origins is that he was a "wandering Jew" or an exiled Transylvanian Prince. His "dragon book" implies that his lineage is secretly identified with the Dragon. All those threads weave together once we realize that Royal Ashina Khazars, a dynasty of converted Jews ruled Khazaria (ancient Scythia) from about 650 to 1016. Two royal clans merged: in Hebrew Ha-Shechina, and Turkic Ashina.
They were preceded by proto-Scythian kings who initiated a custodial tradition of seership and wisdom that migrated with them from Transylvania and Central Asia throughout Europe. Thus, the Scythian dynasties permeated European royalty as individual Dragon lineages fused. The "Royal Scyths" inherited vast metaphysical knowledge and paranormal abilities from their progenitors - the Priest-Kings ("En"). These Annunaki were deified by the ancient Sumerians and Babylonians in their mythological systems, and paralleled the ancient Hebrew Anakim and Nephilim. Nicholas de Vere these Elven peoples synchronized with a higher [n-]dimensional plane which has inspired tales of the "Otherworld" in Celtic folklore. The Dragon is one of the species oldest and most enduring symbols.
The (Central Asian) Khazar name is derived from Turkic *qaz-, meaning "to wander." The Ashina was considered a sacred clan of quasi-divine status. The Ashina clan, a noble caste, carry the 16q24.3 "red gene" inherited from the Sumerian Annunaki, the root of the Dragon seed that permeates royal lines: Merovingian, Carolingian, Tudor, Plantagenet, Stuart, Hapsburg, Hanoverian, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Guelph, Bowes-Lyon, Battenberg (Mountbatten), Guise, and Savoy families - and Transylvanian lineages. The Davidic House of Judah married into the descent of the Merovingian Kings of the Franks. They are connected by a shared bloodline. The dragon archetype rests within the Dragon blood, passed on through the genes.
According to Prince Nicholas de Vere, the dragon lineage arose in Transylvania before the flooding of the Black Sea, over 5,000 years ago. "Briefly, the Dragon lineage starts in the Caucasus with the Annunaki, descending through migrating proto-Scythians to the Sumerians while branching off also into the early Egyptians, Phoenicians and Mittani. A marriage bridge back to Scythia infused the Elvin line of “Tuatha de Danaan” and the Fir Bolg, which branched into the Arch-Druidic, Priest-Princely family to the Royal Picts of Scotland and the ring kings of the Horse Lords of Dal Riada, through the Elven dynasty of Pendragon and Avallon del Acqs, and down to a few pure bred families today."
The Royal Court of the Dragon was founded by the priests of Mendes in about 2200 BC and was subsequently ratified by the 12th dynasty Queen Sobeknefru. This sovereign and priestly Order passed from Egypt to the Kings of Jerusalem; to the Black Sea Princes of Scythia (Princess Milouziana of the Scythians) and into the Balkans - notably to the Royal House of Hungary, whose King Sigismund reconstituted the Court just 600 years ago. Sigismund assumed descent from Melusine. Her ancestry actually can be traced back to the Scythian Dragon Princess Scota, Queen Sobekh Nefru and the Egyptian Cult of the Dragon. Vlad Dracul was a minion of Sigismund of Luxembourg, and was educated at the Emperor's court in Nuremberg. Dracul was invested into Societas Draconis.
The Byzantine Emperor Constantine was a Dragon King. The Byzantine emperor Leo III married his son Constantine (V) to the Khazar princess as part of the alliance between the two empires. Princess Tzitzak was baptized as Irene. Their son Leo (Leo IV) was known as "Leo the Khazar", emperor of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire from 775 to 780.
The "secret of immortality" of the "Wandering Jew" is the in-bred dynasty. For the ancient Egyptians, immortality lay partly in historical remembrance of one's name. Some say the nomadic Khazars derived from both the Edomites and the so-called “Lost Tribes”. Like their Edomite ancestors, the Khazars were also red-headed, and came to be known as “Red Jews”. Transylvania was part of the Khazarian Empire (with roots from Mongolia to Transylvania). The Khazar ruling class was strikingly handsome with reddish hair, white skin and blue eyes.
Did these embedded symbolic hints concealed St. Germain's dragon identity from all but the familial European royalty? Comte de St. Germain has been plausibly identified as the younger son (b. 1696) of the Prince Franz-Leopold Rakoczy and the Princess Charlotte Amalie of Hesse-Wahnfried. He was concealed from the Hapsburgs and lived incognito. The Hesse blood would invest St. Germain with matrilineal dragon genes, and provide a family link to the royal patron of his later years, Landgrave Karl von Hessen-Kassel (1744-1836).
Princess Charlotte Amalie zu Hessen-Wanfried-Eschwege, 1679-1722. Married June 1678.[or Sept. 25, 1694???]
born in Köln an der Rhein, North Rhine-Westphalia, Preussen
Born in Kassel, Hessen-Nassau, Preussen; died in Paris Charlotte married Ferencz Leopold II Rakoczi, Prince of Transylvania, b. 27 Mar 1676, Borsi, Zemplen Megyé, Hungary , d. 8 Apr 1735, Rodosto Am Marmara Meer, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (59 years)
Her parents:
Landgrave Karl von Hessen-Wanfried-Eschwege, b. 19 Jul 1649-29 Jul 1649, Rheinfels, North Rhine-Westphalia, Preussen , d. 3 Mar 1710/11, Langenschwalbach, Hessen-Nassau, Preussen (61 years) Mother -
Countess Alexandrine Juliane von Leiningen-Dagsburg-Falkenburg, b. 21 Aug 1651, , d. 19 Apr 1703, Wanfried, Hessen-Nassau, Preussen (51 years) Married 1678 Prince Karl of Hesse,7 writing of M. de St. Germain, says: ?
“Some curiosity may be felt as to his history; I will trace it with the utmost truthfulness,according to his own words, adding any necessary explanations. He told me that he waseight-eight years of age when he came here, and that he was the son of Prince Ragoczy 8of Transylvania by his first wife, a Tekeli. He was placed, when quite young, under thecare of the last Duc de Medici (Gian Gastone), who made him sleep while still a child inhis own room. When M. de St. Germain learned that his two brothers, sons of thePrincess of Hesse-Wahnfried (Rheinfels), Few pages of history are more deeply scored with sorrow, suffering and impotentstruggle than those which tell the life story of the efforts of one Ragoczy after another topreserve the freedom of their principality, and to save it from being swallowed up by therapidly growing Austrian Empire under the influence of the Roman Church. In an oldGerman book, Genealogische Archivarius aus dem Jahr 1734, pp. 409, 410,438, Leipzig,a sketch is given, on the death and descendants, from which we will quote some leadingfacts: Francis Leopold Racozi, or Rakoczy, according to the later spelling ? the father ofthe famous mystic ? made ineffectual efforts to reagin his throne, the principality ofSiebenburgen. The Ragoczy property was wealthy and valuable, and Prince Francis,grandfather of the mystic of whom we are writing, had lost his life in a hopeless struggleto retain his freedom; on his death, his widow and children were seized by the AustrianEmperor, and hence the son, Frncis Leopold, was brought up at the Court of Vienna. Asour informant says: “The widowed Princess (who had remarried Graf Tekeli) was forcedto hand over her children with their properties to the Emperor, who said he wouldbecome their guardian and be responsible for their education.”This arrangement wasmade in March, 1688, when, however, Prince Francis came of age, his properties, withmany restrictions and limitations, were given back to him by the Emperor of Austria. In1694 this Prince Ragoczy married at Koln-am-Rhein, Charlotte Amalia, daughter of theLandgraf Karl von Hesse-Wahnfried (of the line of Rhein-fels). Of this marriage therewere three children, Joseph, George and Charlotte. Almost immediately after this periodPrince Ragoczy began to lead the conspiracies of his noblemen against the AustrianEmpire, with the object of regaining his independent power. The history of the struggle ismost interesting in every way, and singularly pathetic. The Prince was defeated and allhis properties were confiscated. The sons had to give up the name of Ragoczy, and to takethe titles of St. Carlo and St. Elizabeth.Let us notice what Hezekiel9 has to say on this point, for he has made some very careful
investigations on the subject: “We are, in fact, inclined to think the Comte de St. Germain
was the younger son of the Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte
Amalia of Hesse-Wahnfried. Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte Amalia
of Hesse-Wahnfried. Fran-Leopold was married in 1694, and by this marriage he had two
sons, who were taken prisoners by the Austrians and brought up as Roman Catholics;
they were also forced to give up the dreaded name of Ragoczy. The eldest son, calling
himself the Marquis of San Carlo, escaped from Vienna in 1734. In this year, after
fruitless struggles, his father died at Rodosto in Turkey, and was buried in Smyrna. The
eldest son then received his father’s Turkish pension, and was acknowledged Prince of
Siebenburgen (Transylvania). He carried on the ame warfare as his father, fought against Let us notice what Hezekiel9 has to say on this point, for he has made some very careful
investigations on the subject: “We are, in fact, inclined to think the Comte de St. Germain
was the younger son of the Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte
Amalia of Hesse-Wahnfried. Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte Amalia
of Hesse-Wahnfried. Fran-Leopold was married in 1694, and by this marriage he had two
sons, who were taken prisoners by the Austrians and brought up as Roman Catholics;
they were also forced to give up the dreaded name of Ragoczy. The eldest son, calling
himself the Marquis of San Carlo, escaped from Vienna in 1734. In this year, after
fruitless struggles, his father died at Rodosto in Turkey, and was buried in Smyrna. The
eldest son then received his father’s Turkish pension, and was acknowledged Prince of
Siebenburgen (Transylvania). He carried on the ame warfare as his father, fought against
Transylvanian royalty belonged to the Dragon Court. So, St. Germain might represent himself authentically as a "Wandering Jew" with the secret of immortality, while being Transylvanian (the royal House of Rakoczy) and carrying the Dragon legacy with which he emblazoned his singular book.
Whether it was genetically accurate or not, he had plausible reasons to believe so in his day. In fact, this Dragon connection may explain why he was itinerant, not merely a wandering magician, scholar and businessman -- but a man with a mission. Was this dragon emblem the symbol of his natural family? As a Hungarian or Transylvanian prince, was he either part of or in a struggle to restore a bloodline, bred for rulership and magic?
Transylvania is the earliest known homeland of the Dragon Kings. But, according to Nicholas de Vere, the House of Dracul descended from sons of Attila the Hun with no bloodline connection to Egypt. So it claimed an apostolic succession. There is no definable bloodline link or marriage bridge. If there was indeed dynastic [self-]deception, Saint Germain was unlikely to be any but an unwitting part, and would probably have identified strongly with this legacy. It is a legacy of seership through the genetic root – clear seeing, clairvoyance, trancendent consciousness.
The Dragon Tradition was alive and well during the time of Saint Germain and he was certainly part of it as a Transylvanian prince, whether he could pass a “Dragon DNA test” or not. It is no accident one of his only two original works carried the Dragon emblem. No wonder the Triangular Book has been held closely ever since.
WHO WAS ST. GERMAIN?
The following is offered as suggestion rather than proof:
Among the legends of his origins is that he was a "wandering Jew" or an exiled Transylvanian Prince. His "dragon book" implies that his lineage is secretly identified with the Dragon. All those threads weave together once we realize that Royal Ashina Khazars, a dynasty of converted Jews ruled Khazaria (ancient Scythia) from about 650 to 1016. Two royal clans merged: in Hebrew Ha-Shechina, and Turkic Ashina.
They were preceded by proto-Scythian kings who initiated a custodial tradition of seership and wisdom that migrated with them from Transylvania and Central Asia throughout Europe. Thus, the Scythian dynasties permeated European royalty as individual Dragon lineages fused. The "Royal Scyths" inherited vast metaphysical knowledge and paranormal abilities from their progenitors - the Priest-Kings ("En"). These Annunaki were deified by the ancient Sumerians and Babylonians in their mythological systems, and paralleled the ancient Hebrew Anakim and Nephilim. Nicholas de Vere these Elven peoples synchronized with a higher [n-]dimensional plane which has inspired tales of the "Otherworld" in Celtic folklore. The Dragon is one of the species oldest and most enduring symbols.
The (Central Asian) Khazar name is derived from Turkic *qaz-, meaning "to wander." The Ashina was considered a sacred clan of quasi-divine status. The Ashina clan, a noble caste, carry the 16q24.3 "red gene" inherited from the Sumerian Annunaki, the root of the Dragon seed that permeates royal lines: Merovingian, Carolingian, Tudor, Plantagenet, Stuart, Hapsburg, Hanoverian, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Guelph, Bowes-Lyon, Battenberg (Mountbatten), Guise, and Savoy families - and Transylvanian lineages. The Davidic House of Judah married into the descent of the Merovingian Kings of the Franks. They are connected by a shared bloodline. The dragon archetype rests within the Dragon blood, passed on through the genes.
According to Prince Nicholas de Vere, the dragon lineage arose in Transylvania before the flooding of the Black Sea, over 5,000 years ago. "Briefly, the Dragon lineage starts in the Caucasus with the Annunaki, descending through migrating proto-Scythians to the Sumerians while branching off also into the early Egyptians, Phoenicians and Mittani. A marriage bridge back to Scythia infused the Elvin line of “Tuatha de Danaan” and the Fir Bolg, which branched into the Arch-Druidic, Priest-Princely family to the Royal Picts of Scotland and the ring kings of the Horse Lords of Dal Riada, through the Elven dynasty of Pendragon and Avallon del Acqs, and down to a few pure bred families today."
The Royal Court of the Dragon was founded by the priests of Mendes in about 2200 BC and was subsequently ratified by the 12th dynasty Queen Sobeknefru. This sovereign and priestly Order passed from Egypt to the Kings of Jerusalem; to the Black Sea Princes of Scythia (Princess Milouziana of the Scythians) and into the Balkans - notably to the Royal House of Hungary, whose King Sigismund reconstituted the Court just 600 years ago. Sigismund assumed descent from Melusine. Her ancestry actually can be traced back to the Scythian Dragon Princess Scota, Queen Sobekh Nefru and the Egyptian Cult of the Dragon. Vlad Dracul was a minion of Sigismund of Luxembourg, and was educated at the Emperor's court in Nuremberg. Dracul was invested into Societas Draconis.
The Byzantine Emperor Constantine was a Dragon King. The Byzantine emperor Leo III married his son Constantine (V) to the Khazar princess as part of the alliance between the two empires. Princess Tzitzak was baptized as Irene. Their son Leo (Leo IV) was known as "Leo the Khazar", emperor of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire from 775 to 780.
The "secret of immortality" of the "Wandering Jew" is the in-bred dynasty. For the ancient Egyptians, immortality lay partly in historical remembrance of one's name. Some say the nomadic Khazars derived from both the Edomites and the so-called “Lost Tribes”. Like their Edomite ancestors, the Khazars were also red-headed, and came to be known as “Red Jews”. Transylvania was part of the Khazarian Empire (with roots from Mongolia to Transylvania). The Khazar ruling class was strikingly handsome with reddish hair, white skin and blue eyes.
Did these embedded symbolic hints concealed St. Germain's dragon identity from all but the familial European royalty? Comte de St. Germain has been plausibly identified as the younger son (b. 1696) of the Prince Franz-Leopold Rakoczy and the Princess Charlotte Amalie of Hesse-Wahnfried. He was concealed from the Hapsburgs and lived incognito. The Hesse blood would invest St. Germain with matrilineal dragon genes, and provide a family link to the royal patron of his later years, Landgrave Karl von Hessen-Kassel (1744-1836).
Princess Charlotte Amalie zu Hessen-Wanfried-Eschwege, 1679-1722. Married June 1678.[or Sept. 25, 1694???]
born in Köln an der Rhein, North Rhine-Westphalia, Preussen
Born in Kassel, Hessen-Nassau, Preussen; died in Paris Charlotte married Ferencz Leopold II Rakoczi, Prince of Transylvania, b. 27 Mar 1676, Borsi, Zemplen Megyé, Hungary , d. 8 Apr 1735, Rodosto Am Marmara Meer, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (59 years)
Her parents:
Landgrave Karl von Hessen-Wanfried-Eschwege, b. 19 Jul 1649-29 Jul 1649, Rheinfels, North Rhine-Westphalia, Preussen , d. 3 Mar 1710/11, Langenschwalbach, Hessen-Nassau, Preussen (61 years) Mother -
Countess Alexandrine Juliane von Leiningen-Dagsburg-Falkenburg, b. 21 Aug 1651, , d. 19 Apr 1703, Wanfried, Hessen-Nassau, Preussen (51 years) Married 1678 Prince Karl of Hesse,7 writing of M. de St. Germain, says: ?
“Some curiosity may be felt as to his history; I will trace it with the utmost truthfulness,according to his own words, adding any necessary explanations. He told me that he waseight-eight years of age when he came here, and that he was the son of Prince Ragoczy 8of Transylvania by his first wife, a Tekeli. He was placed, when quite young, under thecare of the last Duc de Medici (Gian Gastone), who made him sleep while still a child inhis own room. When M. de St. Germain learned that his two brothers, sons of thePrincess of Hesse-Wahnfried (Rheinfels), Few pages of history are more deeply scored with sorrow, suffering and impotentstruggle than those which tell the life story of the efforts of one Ragoczy after another topreserve the freedom of their principality, and to save it from being swallowed up by therapidly growing Austrian Empire under the influence of the Roman Church. In an oldGerman book, Genealogische Archivarius aus dem Jahr 1734, pp. 409, 410,438, Leipzig,a sketch is given, on the death and descendants, from which we will quote some leadingfacts: Francis Leopold Racozi, or Rakoczy, according to the later spelling ? the father ofthe famous mystic ? made ineffectual efforts to reagin his throne, the principality ofSiebenburgen. The Ragoczy property was wealthy and valuable, and Prince Francis,grandfather of the mystic of whom we are writing, had lost his life in a hopeless struggleto retain his freedom; on his death, his widow and children were seized by the AustrianEmperor, and hence the son, Frncis Leopold, was brought up at the Court of Vienna. Asour informant says: “The widowed Princess (who had remarried Graf Tekeli) was forcedto hand over her children with their properties to the Emperor, who said he wouldbecome their guardian and be responsible for their education.”This arrangement wasmade in March, 1688, when, however, Prince Francis came of age, his properties, withmany restrictions and limitations, were given back to him by the Emperor of Austria. In1694 this Prince Ragoczy married at Koln-am-Rhein, Charlotte Amalia, daughter of theLandgraf Karl von Hesse-Wahnfried (of the line of Rhein-fels). Of this marriage therewere three children, Joseph, George and Charlotte. Almost immediately after this periodPrince Ragoczy began to lead the conspiracies of his noblemen against the AustrianEmpire, with the object of regaining his independent power. The history of the struggle ismost interesting in every way, and singularly pathetic. The Prince was defeated and allhis properties were confiscated. The sons had to give up the name of Ragoczy, and to takethe titles of St. Carlo and St. Elizabeth.Let us notice what Hezekiel9 has to say on this point, for he has made some very careful
investigations on the subject: “We are, in fact, inclined to think the Comte de St. Germain
was the younger son of the Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte
Amalia of Hesse-Wahnfried. Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte Amalia
of Hesse-Wahnfried. Fran-Leopold was married in 1694, and by this marriage he had two
sons, who were taken prisoners by the Austrians and brought up as Roman Catholics;
they were also forced to give up the dreaded name of Ragoczy. The eldest son, calling
himself the Marquis of San Carlo, escaped from Vienna in 1734. In this year, after
fruitless struggles, his father died at Rodosto in Turkey, and was buried in Smyrna. The
eldest son then received his father’s Turkish pension, and was acknowledged Prince of
Siebenburgen (Transylvania). He carried on the ame warfare as his father, fought against Let us notice what Hezekiel9 has to say on this point, for he has made some very careful
investigations on the subject: “We are, in fact, inclined to think the Comte de St. Germain
was the younger son of the Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte
Amalia of Hesse-Wahnfried. Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte Amalia
of Hesse-Wahnfried. Fran-Leopold was married in 1694, and by this marriage he had two
sons, who were taken prisoners by the Austrians and brought up as Roman Catholics;
they were also forced to give up the dreaded name of Ragoczy. The eldest son, calling
himself the Marquis of San Carlo, escaped from Vienna in 1734. In this year, after
fruitless struggles, his father died at Rodosto in Turkey, and was buried in Smyrna. The
eldest son then received his father’s Turkish pension, and was acknowledged Prince of
Siebenburgen (Transylvania). He carried on the ame warfare as his father, fought against
Transylvanian royalty belonged to the Dragon Court. So, St. Germain might represent himself authentically as a "Wandering Jew" with the secret of immortality, while being Transylvanian (the royal House of Rakoczy) and carrying the Dragon legacy with which he emblazoned his singular book.
Whether it was genetically accurate or not, he had plausible reasons to believe so in his day. In fact, this Dragon connection may explain why he was itinerant, not merely a wandering magician, scholar and businessman -- but a man with a mission. Was this dragon emblem the symbol of his natural family? As a Hungarian or Transylvanian prince, was he either part of or in a struggle to restore a bloodline, bred for rulership and magic?
Transylvania is the earliest known homeland of the Dragon Kings. But, according to Nicholas de Vere, the House of Dracul descended from sons of Attila the Hun with no bloodline connection to Egypt. So it claimed an apostolic succession. There is no definable bloodline link or marriage bridge. If there was indeed dynastic [self-]deception, Saint Germain was unlikely to be any but an unwitting part, and would probably have identified strongly with this legacy. It is a legacy of seership through the genetic root – clear seeing, clairvoyance, trancendent consciousness.
The Dragon Tradition was alive and well during the time of Saint Germain and he was certainly part of it as a Transylvanian prince, whether he could pass a “Dragon DNA test” or not. It is no accident one of his only two original works carried the Dragon emblem. No wonder the Triangular Book has been held closely ever since.
rough notes - Latest development is currently living in Hungary Wegrosta Bavarian ducal family of Count Saint-Germain-descendants claim to be - they would have been a German forends. Mivel a gróf családalapításáról nem tudunk, anyai, illetve oldalági rokonságról lehet szó. Whereas we can not count családalapításáról, maternal or collateral KINSHIP could be involved.. Early years: The third son of Hungarian Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and Princess Charlotte of Hesse-Wahnfried lived most of his life in Eastern Europe. Yet many details of personal biography are shrouded in mystery like forests mists of the Alps. His grandfather was a mystic who lost his life and property to the Austrian Emperor, fighting for personal freedoms. Prince Karl of Hesse who was his cousin, fellow Templar and life long friend to the Comte, stated that the children of Franz Ragoczy were brought up in the court of the Emperor of Austria, except for one who was secretly given into the guardianship of the “last descendant of the Medici family” in the Tuscan countryside. If St. Germain was sent to live under the protection of the Medici’s, he could have studied at the University of Siena (where he was seen in 1739). He also could have had access to the vast resources of the Medici libraries, where he could have advanced his knowledge in all esoteric studies. The scientific development of the mid 17th Century Italy reached its apex under the government of Cosimo III. In previous generations, the Medicis had been protectors and guardians of Kabbalah and Hermetic schools, which contributed to the flowering of the Italian Renaissance. In the late 1400’s, Lorenzo de Medici actually employed the Neo-Platonist, Maresilio Ficino to translate the first Platonic and the Alexandrian Hermetic texts from Greek into Latin, thus opening these subjects to European scholars.
The Comte’s travels follow a linear time line of epic proportions for the 18th Century:
• 1710: Venice – appearance as a man of 45 years of age
• 1739: University of Siena as student
• 1743: Maria Theresa’s Court
• 1745: Arrested and released in Edinburgh, Scotland as spy in the second Jacobite rebellion to re-instate the Stewart dynasty upon the Scottish throne. In that same year, he also was rumored to serve as secret agent in the War of Austrian Succession to overthrow the Anglo-Hanoverian army and establish Francis I as Holy Roman Emperor. Maria Theresa was said to be his friend. Maria Theresa was the mother of Marie Antoinette, to whom the Comte would give counsel later.
• 1745: Vienna as musician
• 1746: England – almost in ruin due to a betrayal of jealousy, slander and lies.
• 1749: Louis XV deployed Germain on secret diplomatic missions
• 1755: India
• 1757: Court of Louis XV Château of Chambord.
• 1758: Voltaire’s writes of “The man who never dies,”
• 1762: Count Alixis Ornhoff places St. Germain in Russian courts of Catherine the Great.
• 1774: France with Madame Pompadour and Marie Antoinette
• 1776: Philadelphia – the signing of the Declaration of Independence
• 1777: Leipzig and Meissen
• 1784: Hesse Cassel, where he was said to have died from an illness… no grave, burial has ever been recorded.
• 1786: Stood with Princess Lamballe at her tribunal in Paris
• 1793: Stood with Jeanne Dubarry at the guillotine in the days of Terror
• 1794-97: France, possibly in prison, where he wrote the Most Holy Trinosophia
• 1838: Hungary during the Magyar Rebellion, as poet on a battlefieldMany accounts described him attending intimate gatherings in court after court, he offered his insights spiced with light-hearted laughter and twinkling jewels of fantastic stories. His music then worked its magic to sooth away any doubts of skepticism. Among his other gifts and talents he was master musician, artist, diplomat, writer, painter, gemologist, goldsmith and much more.
The list of his illustrious friends is long: Medici family, King Louis the XIV, XV, and XVI, Fredrick the Great, Alessandro di Cagliostro, Prince Karl of Hesse Cassel, Maria Theresa/ Francois de Lorraine of Austria, Marie Antoinette (Maria Theresa’s daughter), Voltaire, Rousseau, Goethe, Swedenborg, Charles Stuart (the Young Pretender) of Scotland, Madame Pompadour, Horace Walpole, just to name a few.
As a side note, The Order of St. Germain was established in 1703 that became the new hereditary order for the Royal House of Stuart. Their duties were to preserve the honor of Stuart heritage against detrimental that came out of the current English courts during Hanoverian times. They became international champions of liberty in their actions in the War of Austrian Succession (1740 – 1748) and The American War of Independence (1776-83.) In the Jacobite Rebellion, the knights loyally supported “Bonnie Prince Charlie” as front line diplomats and ambassadors, linking intelligence support of Stuarts to counter Hanoverian Secret Service. Kings from all over Europe respected these knights. Kings of France, Sardinia, Spain, Saxony, Poland, Austrian Emperors, Tsars of Russia and Dukes of Italy all found themselves to be beneficiaries of the intelligence services of this Order. There is no direct evidence that the Comte is connected to this Order, but it makes one wonder if this is another dotted line drawn behind the pages of history. If in fact the Comte was not born in 1710, but earlier, could he have also established this Order? No one knows. This Order of champions still exists today with the same goals. Time has not altered their “raison d’être.”
Conclusion: M. le Comte de St. Germain did not seem to thirst for power over other individuals, but appeared to focus his energies on perpetuating individual freedom at many levels. This underlying motivation toward the pursuit of happiness is most intriguing. Why would a man of such gentle breeding need to be protected in secret by the Medici Family, only to be outwardly deprived of his birthright? Why would he be willing to give up worldly status to play the game of “cat and mouse” at every turn for the sake of an obscure higher purpose, hidden behind the veil of one revolution after another? Why would he risk his reputation and even his physical safety for such tentative and fragile out-comes. It is only in retrospect that one might see the wisdom of such antics.
A chronicle of the will of Prince Leopold Ragoczy (1736) gives direction to King Louis XIV to invest and manage property as custodian of his third son. Executors of this will were the Duc de Bourbon, de Maine, and the Comtes de Charleroi and Toulouse. The supposition that St. Germain is this third son makes sense in light of the fact that he was personal friend of Maria Theresa and also a champion of the reestablishment of the Stuart Dynasty on many fronts. Maria Theresa and the Comte were both of Stuart lineage. At the demise of the Medici dynasty, in 1737, Maria Theresa absorbed the city of Florence and all Medici properties into the Hapsburg properties. By 1743, Maria Theresa credited the Comte with assisting her husband to gain title to the Austrian throne.
In 1694 this Prince Ragoczy married at Köln-am-Rhein, Charlotte Amalia, daughter of the Landgraf Karl von Hesse-Wahnfried (of the line of Rhein-fels). Of this marriage there were three children, Joseph, George and Charlotte. Almost immediately after this period Prince Ragoczy began to lead the conspiracies of his noblemen against the Austrian Empire, with the object of regaining his independent power. The history of the struggle is most interesting in every way, and singularly pathetic. The Prince was defeated and all his properties were confiscated. The sons had to give up the name of Ragoczy, and to take the titles of St. Carlo and St. Elizabeth.in 1694, and by this marriage he had two sons, who were taken prisoners by the Austrians and brought up as Roman Catholics; they were also forced to give up the dreaded name of Ragoczy. The eldest son, calling himself the Marquis of San Carlo, escaped from Vienna in 1734. In this year, after fruitless struggles, his father died at Rodosto in Turkey, and was buried in Smyrna. The eldest son then received his father's Turkish pension, and was acknowledged Prince of Siebenbürgen (Transylvania). He carried on the same warfare as his father, fought against and was driven away by Prince Ferdinand of Lobkowitz, and finally died forgotten in Turkey. The younger brother took no part in the enterprises of his elder brother, and appears, therefore, to have been always on good terms with the Austrian Government." us whence the large fortune possessed by this mystic was derived, but also why he was so warmly welcomed by the King of France, and was so well known at all the courts of Europe. No obscure adventurer is this with whom we are dealing, but a man of princely blood, and of almost royal descent.
Turning back to the old chronicle we find in the volume for 1736 the will of the late Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy, in which both his sons are mentioned who have been already named, and also a third son. 1 It also states that Louis XIV. had bought landed property for this Prince Ragoczy from the Polish Queen Maria, the rents of which property were invested by the order of the King of France in the Hôtel de Ville in Paris. We also find that considerable legacies were left which were to be demanded from the Crown of France. The executors of this will were the Duc de Bourbon, the Duc de Maine and the Comte de Charleroi and Toulouse. To their care Prince Ragoczy committed his third son, to whom also he left a large legacy and other rights on this valuable property. Hence we must cast aside the theories that M. de St. Germain was a homeless and penniless adventurer, seeking to make money out of any kindlydisposed person. These were the views and ideas of the newspaper and review writers of that day, put forward in the leading periodicals. Unfortunately the law of heredity prevails in this class of people, and there is a remarkable similarity between the epithets hurled by the press of the nineteenth century at the venturesome occultist of to-day and those flung at M. de St. Germain and other mystics of lesser importance and minor merit.
We will now pass from this portion of our subject to some of the personal incidents related of M. de St. Germain; perhaps the most interesting are those given by one who knew him personally in Anspach during the period that he was in close connection with the Markgraf. It appears that the mystic made two visits at different times to Schwalbach, and thence he went to Triesdorf. We will let the writer speak for himself on this point:--
"On hearing that a stranger, both remarkable and interesting, was at Schwalbach, the Markgraf of Brandenburg-Anspach invited him to come to Triesdorf in the spring, and the Graf Tzarogy (for this was the name under which he appeared) accepted this invitation, on the condition that they would allow him to live in his own way quite unnoticed and at peace.
He was lodged in the lower rooms of theCastle, below those occupied by Mademoiselle Clairon. The Markgraf and his wife lived in the Falkenhaus. The Graf Tzarogy had no servant of his own; he dined as simply as possible in his own room, which he seldom left. His wants were extremely few, and he avoided all general society, spending the evenings in the company of only the Markgraf, Mademoiselle Clairon, and those persons whom the former was pleased to have around him. It was impossible to persuade the Graf Tzarogy to dine at the Prince's table, and he only saw the Markgräfin a few times, although she was very curious to make the acquaintance of this strange individual. In conversation the Graf was most entertaining, and showed much knowledge of the world and of men. He was always specially glad to speak of his childhood and of his mother, to whom he never referred without emotion, and often with tears in his eyes. If one could believe him, he had been brought up like a Prince. One day Tzarogy showed the Markgraf an invitation which he had received, sent by a courier, from the Graf Alexis Orloff, who was just returning from Italy; the letter pressed Graf Tzarogy to pay him a visit, as Graf Orloff was passing through Nuremberg. . . . The Markgraf went with Graf Tzarogy to Nuremberg, where the Graf Alexis Orloff had already arrived. On
p. 18
their arrival Orloff, with open arms, came forward to meet and embrace the Graf Tzarogy, who now appeared for the first time in the uniform of a Russian General; and Orloff called him several times, 'Caro padre,' 'Caro amico.' The Graf Alexis received the Markgraf of Brandenburg-Anspach with the most marked politeness, and thanked him several times for the protection which the Markgraf had accorded to his worthy friend; they dined together at midday. The conversation was most interesting; they spoke a good deal of the campaign in the Archipelago, and . still more about useful and scientific discoveries. Orloff showed the Markgraf a piece of unignitable wood, which when tested produced neither flames nor cinders, but simply fell to pieces in light ashes, after it had swollen up like a sponge. After dinner Graf Orloff took the Graf Tzarogy into the next room, where they remained for some considerable time together. The writer, who was standing at the window under which the carriages of Graf Orloff were drawn up, remarked that one of the Graf's servants came, opened one of the carriage doors and took out from the box under the seat a large red leather bag, and carried it upstairs to the other room. After their return to Anspach the Graf Tzarogy showed them, for the first time, his credentials as a RussianGeneral with the Imperial seal attached; he afterwards informed the Markgraf that the name Tzarogy was an assumed name, and that his real name was Ragotzy, and that he was the sole representative and descendant of the late exiled Prince Ragotzy of Siebenbürgen of the time of the Emperor Leopold". 1
So far this narrative is tolerably accurate, but after this point the author proceeds with the history of what he considers the "unveiling" of the "notorious Comte de St. Germain," in which all the various theories about his birth, to which we have already referred, are retold with embellishments. Amongst other wild reports, it was stated that M. de St. Germain had only become acquainted with the Orloffs in Leghorn in 1770, whereas there are various historical proofs showing, without doubt, that he was in 1762 in St. Petersburg, where he knew the Orloffs well. We have moreover heard in Russia that he was staying with the Princess Marie Galitzin at Archangelskoi on March 3rd, 1762.
The following details were found in Russia, and sent by a Russian friend:--
"The Comte de St. Germain was here in the time of Peter III. and left when Catherine II.came to the throne. M. Pyliaeff 1 thinks even before Catherine's time.
"At St. Petersburg St. Germain lived with Count Rotari, the famous Italian painter, who was the painter of the beautiful portraits which are in the Peterhof palace.
"The street where they lived is supposed to be the Grafsky péréoulok ('péréoulok' means small street, and 'Grafsky' comes from Graf-Count) near the Anitchkoff bridge where the palace is, on the Newsky. St. Germain was a splendid violinist, he 'played like an orchestra.' In the 'Story of the Razoamovsky family' Alexis R. was reported to have spoken of a beautiful moonstone St. Germain had in his possession.
"M. Pyliaeff has seen (he cannot remember where now) a piece of music, some air for the harp, dedicated to Countess Ostermann by St. Germain's own hand signed. It is bound beautifully in red maroquin. The date is about 1760.
"M. Pyliaeff thinks that St. Germain was not in Moscow. He says the Youssoupoff family have many MSS. in old chests and that St. Germain was in relations with a Prince Youssoupoff to whom he gave the elixir for long life. He says, too, that St. Germain did not bearthe name of Saltykoff (Soltikow) in Russia but that in Vienna he did take this name.
"About the music signed by St. Germain, M. Pyliaeff now recollects that it belonged to him himself. He bought it at some sale and had it for some time. Then he gave it to the famous composer Peter Chaikowsky as a present. It must now be in Chaikowsky's papers, but as the great musician had very little order, M. Pyliaeff thinks it very unlikely that it could be found, especially as at Chaikowsky's sudden death all was left without any directions being given about the property."
We have said that the political events in his family had to some extent shadowed the life of M. de St. Germain; one remarkable instance of this we will now cite: it is, as far as we know, the only one in which he himself makes any direct reference to it, and it occurs some time later than the events which we have just been relating. After the return of the Markgraf from Italy, whither he had gone in 1776, and where he had heard some of the legends and fabrications above referred to, he appears to have sent the writer whom we have quoted to Schwalbach to see the Graf Tzarogy, and to test his bona fides. We will continue the history as he gives it. "On his arrival, he found M. de St. Germain ill in bed. When the matter was explained to
p. 22
him, he admitted with perfect coolness that he had assumed from time to time all the names mentioned, even down to that of Soltikow; but he said he was known on all sides, and to many people, under these names, as a man of honour, and that if any calumniator were venturing to accuse him of nefarious transactions, he was ready to exculpate himself in the most satisfactory manner, as soon as he knew of what he was accused, and who the accuser was who dared to attack him. He steadily asserted that he had not told the Markgraf any lies with reference to his name and his family. The proofs of his origin, however, were in the hands of a person on whom he was dependent (i.e., the Emperor of Austria), a dependence which had brought on him, in the course of his life, the greatest espionage. . . . When he was asked why he had not informed the Markgraf about the different names under which he had appeared in so many different places, the Graf Tzarogy answered that he was under no obligations to the Markgraf, and that since he offended no one and did no person any harm, he would only give such personal information after and not before he had dealings with them. The Graf said he had never abused the confidence of the Markgraf; he had given his real name. . . . after this he still remained at Schwalbach." A little later the author of theparagraph just quoted remarks: "What resources M. de St. Germain had, to defray the necessary expenses of his existence, is hard to guess." 1
It appears curious to us that the writer knew so little of contemporary history. As we have seen, all the sons of Prince Ragoczy were amply provided for, and the proofs were even more accessible than they are in our day. He goes on to say in conclusion: "It would be an ungrateful task to declare that this man was a swindler; for this proofs are required and they are not to be had." This is truly an ingenious statement, but borders somewhat on libel; to speak of any one as a swindler without any proof is beyond the bounds of ordinary fairness, and it is especially incongruous in view of the final paragraph, which is as follows: "As long as the Graf had dealings with the Markgraf, he never asked for anything, and never received anything of the slightest value, and never mixed himself up in anything which did not concern him. On account of his extremely simple life, his wants were very limited; when he had money he shared it with the poor."
If we compare these words with those spoken of M. de St. Germain by his friend Prince Charles of Hesse, we shall find they are in perfect accord. The only wonder is that a writer
p. 24
who speaks such words of praise can even hint that his subject might be a "swindler." If such words can be rightly spoken of an "adventurer," then would it be well for the world if a few more of like sort could be found.
We shall find similar extraordinary contradictions in various writers as we proceed further with the life of M. de St. Germain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes
4:1 AKSAKOF, A., Psychische Studien, Monatliche Zeitschrift, xii., p. 430. Leipzig, 1885.
5:1 MAUVILLON, J., Geschichte Ferdinands, Herzog von Braunschweig-Luneberg, ii., p. 479. Leipzig, 1794.
5:2 GLEICHEN (E. H. Baron de), Souvenirs, Paris, 1868, p. 126.
7:1 GLEICHEN, Op. cit., p. 127.
7:2 D’ADHÉMAR (La Comtesse), Souvenirs sur Marie Antoinette, Archiduchesse d’Autriche, Reine de France, et sur la Cour de Versaille, Paris, 1836.
8:1 WEBER (Dr. Carl von), Aus vier Jahrhunderten. Mittheilungen aus dem Haupt-Staats-Archive, Zu Dresden, i., p. 312. Tauchnitz, Leipzig, 1857.
10:1 HESSE-CASSEL Karl, Prinz de), Mémoires de Mon Temps, p. 133. Copenhagen, 1861.
10:2 Rágóczy is the German spelling of this name. In Hungary it is written Rákóczy.
13:1 Op. cit., i., 45.
15:1 This is the son, mentioned by Prince Charles of Hesse, who was placed under the care of the last of the Medici.
19:1 Curiositäten der Literarisch-historischen Vor- and Mitwelt, pp. 285, 286. Weimar, 1818.
20:1 Told by M. Pyliaeff, member of the "Novoie Vremia," author of "Old Petersburg."
23:1 Curiositäten, op. cit., pp. 287, 289, 293. 294.
Adverse writers have made much mystery over the fact that the Comte de St. Germain was rich and always had money at his disposal; indeed, those writers who enjoyed calling him a "charlatan and a swindler" did not refrain also from hinting that his money must have been ill-gotten; many even go so far as to say that he made it by deceiving people and exercising an undue influence over them. If we turn to the old Archivarius already mentioned, we find some very definite information that not only shows
p. 15
Let us notice what Hezekiel 1 has to say on this point, for he has made some very careful investigations on the subject: "We are, in fact, inclined to think the Comte de St. Germain was the younger son of the Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte Amalia of Hesse-Wahnfried. Franz-Leopold was married
Saint-Germain's life and activities of an incentive to know each other, in all likelihood, respected as fellow countrymen. Ő maga sohasem beszélt származásáról, nemzetéről, vagy családjáról, mégis mindenki számára nyilvánvaló volt előkelő származása. He never talked about the origin, nemzetéről, or family, it was obvious to everyone privileged background. Valódi nevét senki sem ismerte. Nobody knew his real name. Nevezte magát Marquis de Montferrat-nak, Comte Bellamare-nak, Aymar-nak Velencéből, Chevalier Shoening-nek, Weldon-nak, Comte Soltikoff-nak, Gróf Tzarogy-nak és Ragozy (Ragotzy) hercegnek. Called himself the Marquis de Montferrat's, Comte's Bellamare, Aymar's Venice, Shoening Chevalier's, Weldon's, Soltikoff Comte's, Earl's and Tzarogy Ragozy (Ragotzy) Prince. Mások a szellemekkel foglakozó Cabalais gróffal, a rózsakeresztes Signor Gualdival, a máltai lovagrend fejével, Count Hompesch-sel, vagy egy szintén Saint-Germain nevű francia tábornokkal vélték azonosnak. Others dealing with the spirits Cabalais Count, Signor Gualdival the Rosicrucian, the head of the Order of Malta, Count Hompesch-sel, or a Saint-Germain, also called French generals thought the same. Sokáig tartotta magát az a nézet, hogy spanyol főnemes, Izabella királynő törvénytelen gyermeke, portugál zsidó kabbalista, de ma világszerte a legtöbben II. We have long adhered to the view that Spanish aristocrat, illegitimate son of Queen Isabella, Portuguese, Jewish Kabbalist, but today most of the world II. Rákóczi Ferenc erdélyi fejedelem törvénytelen (?) fiának tekintik. Ferenc Rákóczi prince of Transylvania, the illegal (?) Is considered his son. Ezzel szemben minden valószínűség szerint 1 Rákóczi fejedelem négy törvényes, feleségétől, Hesse-Wahnfried Sarolta Amália hercegnőtől született gyermekének egyike, Lipót György (bár ő állítólag egy éves korában meghalt), vagy az egy évvel később született György. By contrast, in all likelihood, a legitimate four Rákóczi prince, his wife, Charlotte Amalie of Hesse-Wahnfried Princess was born one child, Leopold George (though he supposedly died at the age of one), or a year later, George was born. A kutatók általában Lipót Görgyre (teljes nevén Rákóczi Lipót Lajos György József Antal) gondolnak, aki helyett feltehetően más gyermeket temettek el, míg őt külföldre csempészték – talán a bécsi udvar elől menekítve. The researchers generally Leopold George (born George Rákóczi Louis Leopold Joseph Anthony), they think, rather than possibly any other children who were buried while he smuggled abroad - maybe in the front yard menekítve Vienna. Más források szerint a gyermeket elrabolták. Other sources report that the child has been kidnapped. Nem nehéz rájönni, hogy a „Tzarogy” név is családnevének anagrammája. It is not difficult to figure out the "Tzarogy" name is an anagram surnames. Itáliában nevelkedett az utolsó Medici herceg pártfogása alatt, és a sienai egyetemen tanult – legalábbis egy késői barátja, a Hessen-Casseli Károly herceg szerint. Grew up in Italy under the patronage of the last Medici duke, and educated at the University of Siena - at least for a late friend of Prince Charles of Hesse-Casseli that. Mellesleg talán ideje lenne II. By the way, perhaps it would be time II. Rákóczi Ferenc (1676-1735) spirituális jelentőségét is felülvizsgálni. Ferenc Rákóczi (1676-1735) review of spiritual significance. Míg mi csak történelmi jelentőségét ismerjük, a Teozófiai Társaság hagyományai szerint 2 egyik alapítójukat, HS Olcott ezredest egy egyiptomi, egy indiai és egy magyar mester avatta be (szellemi úton). While we only know the historical significance of the tradition of the Theosophical Society two alapítójukat one, Colonel HS Olcott, an Egyptian, an Indian and a dedication to the Hungarian master (spiritual path). Előző életeiben Rákóczi már számos kiválóság testében élt. Rákóczi several previous lives of excellence, he lived in his body. Egy másik teozófus nagymester, CW Leadbeater is kapcsolatban állt ezzel a mesterrel és Rákóczi Mesternek nevezi. Theosophists another grandmaster, CW Leadbeater in contact with the master and Rákóczi was appointed Master. Szerintük rodostói halálát és temetését is csak megrendezték. Rodostói, according to the death and burial can only be staged. E ponton alakja összemosódik feltételezett fiával, Saint-Germainnel. At this point her son assumed the shape merge, Saint-Germainnel. A történelemben nem túl ritka, hogy valaki a megjátszott temetés után más néven él és dolgozik tovább. The history is not very rare that someone called after the funeral, played live and work on. Mikes Kelementől tudjuk, hogy amikor "holttestét" a házból kivitték, a török őrök csodálkozva jegyezték meg, hogy "Ez nem a ti uratok". Mikes Kelementől know that when a "dead bodies" have been exported out of the house, surprised by the Turkish guards said, "This is not your Lord". Van, aki amellett száll síkra, hogy a fejedelem maga volt Saint-Germain. Is there anyone who pleads that the prince himself was Saint-Germain. Való igaz, hogy a francia forradalom előtti zűrzavaros időkben Európának nagy szüksége volt hathatós szellemi erőkre (sajnos a csőcselék lázadását így sem sikerült elkerülni). It is true that the turbulent times of Europe before the French Revolution was a great need of strong intellectual powers (and unfortunately the mob so the rebellion could not be avoided). Az is igaz, hogy az említett hercegen kívül sehol sincs említés a fiatal Saint-Germainről, viszont ez ellen szól bizonyos von Gergy (Gregory?) hercegnő állítása, miszerint ő 1710-ben találkozott vele Velencében és ekkor 45-50 évesnek nézett ki, hiszen ekkor Rákóczi még itthon élt, a szabadságharc kellős közepén – ha csak nem játszott már akkor kettős szerepet. It is also true that the Prince is mentioned nowhere outside the Saint-Germainről young, but it argues against certain von Gergye (Gregory?) Princess's assertion that he had met him in Venice in 1710 and now 45-50 years old who looked as Rákóczi then still lived at home, in the middle of the War of Independence - only if you have not played a dual role.
Rákóczi fejedelem életének okkult oldalát a külföld jelenleg jobban ismeri, mint mi magunk. Rákóczi prince occult side of life in the rest of the world now knows him better than we do. Sokan úgy vélik, 1701-es szökése a bécsújhelyi börtönből sokkal inkább köszönhető különleges pszichikai képességeinek, mint a történelemből ismert Lehmann kapitány segítségének. Many consider the 1701 Wiener Neustadt prison escape but rather is due to a special psychic abilities, known to history as the help of Captain Lehmann. Erősen érdeklődött az alkímia iránt (talán művelte is), és minden valószínűség szerint kapcsolatban állt az akkori Európa titkos társaságaival – ne feledjük, a XVII-XVIII. Strong interest in alchemy for (probably also been cultivated), and most likely was related to the private companies in Europe at that time - remember, the seventeenth and eighteenth. század a mágia és miszticizmus reneszánsza volt a középkor szigora után! century, the magic and mysticism of the Middle Ages was a renaissance after strictness! Aligha lehet véletlen, hogy Rákóczi sárospataki várának „sub rosa” terméből indult ki a magyar jakobinusok szervezkedése, és a fejedelemnek is köze lehetett a magyarországi szabadkőműves és rózsakeresztes mozgalmak XVIII. Can hardly be coincidence that Sarospatak Rákóczi Castle "sub rosa" Hall of the Hungarian Jacobins began to organize, and the prince could also do with the Masonic and Rosicrucian movements in Hungary XVIII. századi megjelenéséhez. century appearance. A történetírás ennek a feltárásával is adósunk még. The history of this exploration is the debtor.
Mikes Kelemen (1690-1761) levelei szerint Saint-Germain egy ízben meg is látogatta Rodostóban a fejedelmet. Mikes Kelemen (1690-1761) leaves according to Saint-Germain is also a time to visit the prince Rodostóban. Eszerint nem lehetett azonos vele. This means that the same could not be with him. Olyan vélemény is napvilágot látott, hogy a gróf Rákóczinak a XIV. Reviews have been published so that the count of the Rákóczi XIV. Lajos testvére özvegyétől született gyermeke lett volna. Louis's brother's widow children was born. Figyelemre méltó tény lehet az is, hogy Rákóczi végrendeletében a szívét egy franciaországi kolostorba vitette (ahonnan a kolostor lebontásakor a becses ereklye eltűnt). Remarkable fact may also be a testament to the heart of Rákóczi had them taken to a convent in France (where the monastery is demolished the precious relic disappeared). Lehet, hogy sohasem fogjuk megtudni a teljes igazságot – bizonyára, mert ők is így akarták. May be that we will never know the whole truth - probably because they wanted to continue to do so.
Úgy számítják, hogy a legendás gróf 1710-ben, vagy '11-ben született, amennyiben Rákóczi Györggyel azonos, míg, ha Lipót György lenne, úgy 1696. It is calculated that in 1710 the legendary Count, or was born in '11, when George Rákóczi identical, but if George Leopold would be the 1696th május 28-án született. Born on May 28. Sajnos ennek is ellentmond a fentebb említett von Gergy hercegnő állítása. Unfortunately, this also contradicts the above assertion von Gergye princess. Bizonytalan a halála éve is. Uncertain of his death years ago. Bár az Eckenförde-i egyház anyakönyvében 1784-es halálozás van bejegyezve (február 24. dátummal), feltételezik, hogy nem őt temették el e név alatt, mert ezután még több helyen is feltűnt. Although the Church of Eckenförde anyakönyvében deaths registered in 1784 (dated February 24), assume that he is not buried under this name since then has appeared in several places. Az egyik utolsó említés 1822-ből származik, amikor felszállni látták egy Indiába induló hajóra, de az 1880-as években még látta egy rózsakeresztes barátja, akitől azzal búcsúzott, hogy elhagyja Európát, hogy a Himalája hegyei között pihenjen. One of the last mentioned dates from 1822, to take off when they saw a vessel bound for India, but the 1880s saw a Rosicrucian friend, with whom he bid farewell to leave Europe to relax in the mountains of the Himalayas. Feltételezik, hogy a Dalai Láma tanácsadója is volt. Assume that the Dalai Lama was also adviser. Nagy Frigyes porosz uralkodó szerint olyan ember, „aki soha nem hal meg és mindent tud”. Prussian ruler Frederick the Great as a man "who never dies and knows everything."
The Comte’s travels follow a linear time line of epic proportions for the 18th Century:
• 1710: Venice – appearance as a man of 45 years of age
• 1739: University of Siena as student
• 1743: Maria Theresa’s Court
• 1745: Arrested and released in Edinburgh, Scotland as spy in the second Jacobite rebellion to re-instate the Stewart dynasty upon the Scottish throne. In that same year, he also was rumored to serve as secret agent in the War of Austrian Succession to overthrow the Anglo-Hanoverian army and establish Francis I as Holy Roman Emperor. Maria Theresa was said to be his friend. Maria Theresa was the mother of Marie Antoinette, to whom the Comte would give counsel later.
• 1745: Vienna as musician
• 1746: England – almost in ruin due to a betrayal of jealousy, slander and lies.
• 1749: Louis XV deployed Germain on secret diplomatic missions
• 1755: India
• 1757: Court of Louis XV Château of Chambord.
• 1758: Voltaire’s writes of “The man who never dies,”
• 1762: Count Alixis Ornhoff places St. Germain in Russian courts of Catherine the Great.
• 1774: France with Madame Pompadour and Marie Antoinette
• 1776: Philadelphia – the signing of the Declaration of Independence
• 1777: Leipzig and Meissen
• 1784: Hesse Cassel, where he was said to have died from an illness… no grave, burial has ever been recorded.
• 1786: Stood with Princess Lamballe at her tribunal in Paris
• 1793: Stood with Jeanne Dubarry at the guillotine in the days of Terror
• 1794-97: France, possibly in prison, where he wrote the Most Holy Trinosophia
• 1838: Hungary during the Magyar Rebellion, as poet on a battlefieldMany accounts described him attending intimate gatherings in court after court, he offered his insights spiced with light-hearted laughter and twinkling jewels of fantastic stories. His music then worked its magic to sooth away any doubts of skepticism. Among his other gifts and talents he was master musician, artist, diplomat, writer, painter, gemologist, goldsmith and much more.
The list of his illustrious friends is long: Medici family, King Louis the XIV, XV, and XVI, Fredrick the Great, Alessandro di Cagliostro, Prince Karl of Hesse Cassel, Maria Theresa/ Francois de Lorraine of Austria, Marie Antoinette (Maria Theresa’s daughter), Voltaire, Rousseau, Goethe, Swedenborg, Charles Stuart (the Young Pretender) of Scotland, Madame Pompadour, Horace Walpole, just to name a few.
As a side note, The Order of St. Germain was established in 1703 that became the new hereditary order for the Royal House of Stuart. Their duties were to preserve the honor of Stuart heritage against detrimental that came out of the current English courts during Hanoverian times. They became international champions of liberty in their actions in the War of Austrian Succession (1740 – 1748) and The American War of Independence (1776-83.) In the Jacobite Rebellion, the knights loyally supported “Bonnie Prince Charlie” as front line diplomats and ambassadors, linking intelligence support of Stuarts to counter Hanoverian Secret Service. Kings from all over Europe respected these knights. Kings of France, Sardinia, Spain, Saxony, Poland, Austrian Emperors, Tsars of Russia and Dukes of Italy all found themselves to be beneficiaries of the intelligence services of this Order. There is no direct evidence that the Comte is connected to this Order, but it makes one wonder if this is another dotted line drawn behind the pages of history. If in fact the Comte was not born in 1710, but earlier, could he have also established this Order? No one knows. This Order of champions still exists today with the same goals. Time has not altered their “raison d’être.”
Conclusion: M. le Comte de St. Germain did not seem to thirst for power over other individuals, but appeared to focus his energies on perpetuating individual freedom at many levels. This underlying motivation toward the pursuit of happiness is most intriguing. Why would a man of such gentle breeding need to be protected in secret by the Medici Family, only to be outwardly deprived of his birthright? Why would he be willing to give up worldly status to play the game of “cat and mouse” at every turn for the sake of an obscure higher purpose, hidden behind the veil of one revolution after another? Why would he risk his reputation and even his physical safety for such tentative and fragile out-comes. It is only in retrospect that one might see the wisdom of such antics.
A chronicle of the will of Prince Leopold Ragoczy (1736) gives direction to King Louis XIV to invest and manage property as custodian of his third son. Executors of this will were the Duc de Bourbon, de Maine, and the Comtes de Charleroi and Toulouse. The supposition that St. Germain is this third son makes sense in light of the fact that he was personal friend of Maria Theresa and also a champion of the reestablishment of the Stuart Dynasty on many fronts. Maria Theresa and the Comte were both of Stuart lineage. At the demise of the Medici dynasty, in 1737, Maria Theresa absorbed the city of Florence and all Medici properties into the Hapsburg properties. By 1743, Maria Theresa credited the Comte with assisting her husband to gain title to the Austrian throne.
In 1694 this Prince Ragoczy married at Köln-am-Rhein, Charlotte Amalia, daughter of the Landgraf Karl von Hesse-Wahnfried (of the line of Rhein-fels). Of this marriage there were three children, Joseph, George and Charlotte. Almost immediately after this period Prince Ragoczy began to lead the conspiracies of his noblemen against the Austrian Empire, with the object of regaining his independent power. The history of the struggle is most interesting in every way, and singularly pathetic. The Prince was defeated and all his properties were confiscated. The sons had to give up the name of Ragoczy, and to take the titles of St. Carlo and St. Elizabeth.in 1694, and by this marriage he had two sons, who were taken prisoners by the Austrians and brought up as Roman Catholics; they were also forced to give up the dreaded name of Ragoczy. The eldest son, calling himself the Marquis of San Carlo, escaped from Vienna in 1734. In this year, after fruitless struggles, his father died at Rodosto in Turkey, and was buried in Smyrna. The eldest son then received his father's Turkish pension, and was acknowledged Prince of Siebenbürgen (Transylvania). He carried on the same warfare as his father, fought against and was driven away by Prince Ferdinand of Lobkowitz, and finally died forgotten in Turkey. The younger brother took no part in the enterprises of his elder brother, and appears, therefore, to have been always on good terms with the Austrian Government." us whence the large fortune possessed by this mystic was derived, but also why he was so warmly welcomed by the King of France, and was so well known at all the courts of Europe. No obscure adventurer is this with whom we are dealing, but a man of princely blood, and of almost royal descent.
Turning back to the old chronicle we find in the volume for 1736 the will of the late Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy, in which both his sons are mentioned who have been already named, and also a third son. 1 It also states that Louis XIV. had bought landed property for this Prince Ragoczy from the Polish Queen Maria, the rents of which property were invested by the order of the King of France in the Hôtel de Ville in Paris. We also find that considerable legacies were left which were to be demanded from the Crown of France. The executors of this will were the Duc de Bourbon, the Duc de Maine and the Comte de Charleroi and Toulouse. To their care Prince Ragoczy committed his third son, to whom also he left a large legacy and other rights on this valuable property. Hence we must cast aside the theories that M. de St. Germain was a homeless and penniless adventurer, seeking to make money out of any kindlydisposed person. These were the views and ideas of the newspaper and review writers of that day, put forward in the leading periodicals. Unfortunately the law of heredity prevails in this class of people, and there is a remarkable similarity between the epithets hurled by the press of the nineteenth century at the venturesome occultist of to-day and those flung at M. de St. Germain and other mystics of lesser importance and minor merit.
We will now pass from this portion of our subject to some of the personal incidents related of M. de St. Germain; perhaps the most interesting are those given by one who knew him personally in Anspach during the period that he was in close connection with the Markgraf. It appears that the mystic made two visits at different times to Schwalbach, and thence he went to Triesdorf. We will let the writer speak for himself on this point:--
"On hearing that a stranger, both remarkable and interesting, was at Schwalbach, the Markgraf of Brandenburg-Anspach invited him to come to Triesdorf in the spring, and the Graf Tzarogy (for this was the name under which he appeared) accepted this invitation, on the condition that they would allow him to live in his own way quite unnoticed and at peace.
He was lodged in the lower rooms of theCastle, below those occupied by Mademoiselle Clairon. The Markgraf and his wife lived in the Falkenhaus. The Graf Tzarogy had no servant of his own; he dined as simply as possible in his own room, which he seldom left. His wants were extremely few, and he avoided all general society, spending the evenings in the company of only the Markgraf, Mademoiselle Clairon, and those persons whom the former was pleased to have around him. It was impossible to persuade the Graf Tzarogy to dine at the Prince's table, and he only saw the Markgräfin a few times, although she was very curious to make the acquaintance of this strange individual. In conversation the Graf was most entertaining, and showed much knowledge of the world and of men. He was always specially glad to speak of his childhood and of his mother, to whom he never referred without emotion, and often with tears in his eyes. If one could believe him, he had been brought up like a Prince. One day Tzarogy showed the Markgraf an invitation which he had received, sent by a courier, from the Graf Alexis Orloff, who was just returning from Italy; the letter pressed Graf Tzarogy to pay him a visit, as Graf Orloff was passing through Nuremberg. . . . The Markgraf went with Graf Tzarogy to Nuremberg, where the Graf Alexis Orloff had already arrived. On
p. 18
their arrival Orloff, with open arms, came forward to meet and embrace the Graf Tzarogy, who now appeared for the first time in the uniform of a Russian General; and Orloff called him several times, 'Caro padre,' 'Caro amico.' The Graf Alexis received the Markgraf of Brandenburg-Anspach with the most marked politeness, and thanked him several times for the protection which the Markgraf had accorded to his worthy friend; they dined together at midday. The conversation was most interesting; they spoke a good deal of the campaign in the Archipelago, and . still more about useful and scientific discoveries. Orloff showed the Markgraf a piece of unignitable wood, which when tested produced neither flames nor cinders, but simply fell to pieces in light ashes, after it had swollen up like a sponge. After dinner Graf Orloff took the Graf Tzarogy into the next room, where they remained for some considerable time together. The writer, who was standing at the window under which the carriages of Graf Orloff were drawn up, remarked that one of the Graf's servants came, opened one of the carriage doors and took out from the box under the seat a large red leather bag, and carried it upstairs to the other room. After their return to Anspach the Graf Tzarogy showed them, for the first time, his credentials as a RussianGeneral with the Imperial seal attached; he afterwards informed the Markgraf that the name Tzarogy was an assumed name, and that his real name was Ragotzy, and that he was the sole representative and descendant of the late exiled Prince Ragotzy of Siebenbürgen of the time of the Emperor Leopold". 1
So far this narrative is tolerably accurate, but after this point the author proceeds with the history of what he considers the "unveiling" of the "notorious Comte de St. Germain," in which all the various theories about his birth, to which we have already referred, are retold with embellishments. Amongst other wild reports, it was stated that M. de St. Germain had only become acquainted with the Orloffs in Leghorn in 1770, whereas there are various historical proofs showing, without doubt, that he was in 1762 in St. Petersburg, where he knew the Orloffs well. We have moreover heard in Russia that he was staying with the Princess Marie Galitzin at Archangelskoi on March 3rd, 1762.
The following details were found in Russia, and sent by a Russian friend:--
"The Comte de St. Germain was here in the time of Peter III. and left when Catherine II.came to the throne. M. Pyliaeff 1 thinks even before Catherine's time.
"At St. Petersburg St. Germain lived with Count Rotari, the famous Italian painter, who was the painter of the beautiful portraits which are in the Peterhof palace.
"The street where they lived is supposed to be the Grafsky péréoulok ('péréoulok' means small street, and 'Grafsky' comes from Graf-Count) near the Anitchkoff bridge where the palace is, on the Newsky. St. Germain was a splendid violinist, he 'played like an orchestra.' In the 'Story of the Razoamovsky family' Alexis R. was reported to have spoken of a beautiful moonstone St. Germain had in his possession.
"M. Pyliaeff has seen (he cannot remember where now) a piece of music, some air for the harp, dedicated to Countess Ostermann by St. Germain's own hand signed. It is bound beautifully in red maroquin. The date is about 1760.
"M. Pyliaeff thinks that St. Germain was not in Moscow. He says the Youssoupoff family have many MSS. in old chests and that St. Germain was in relations with a Prince Youssoupoff to whom he gave the elixir for long life. He says, too, that St. Germain did not bearthe name of Saltykoff (Soltikow) in Russia but that in Vienna he did take this name.
"About the music signed by St. Germain, M. Pyliaeff now recollects that it belonged to him himself. He bought it at some sale and had it for some time. Then he gave it to the famous composer Peter Chaikowsky as a present. It must now be in Chaikowsky's papers, but as the great musician had very little order, M. Pyliaeff thinks it very unlikely that it could be found, especially as at Chaikowsky's sudden death all was left without any directions being given about the property."
We have said that the political events in his family had to some extent shadowed the life of M. de St. Germain; one remarkable instance of this we will now cite: it is, as far as we know, the only one in which he himself makes any direct reference to it, and it occurs some time later than the events which we have just been relating. After the return of the Markgraf from Italy, whither he had gone in 1776, and where he had heard some of the legends and fabrications above referred to, he appears to have sent the writer whom we have quoted to Schwalbach to see the Graf Tzarogy, and to test his bona fides. We will continue the history as he gives it. "On his arrival, he found M. de St. Germain ill in bed. When the matter was explained to
p. 22
him, he admitted with perfect coolness that he had assumed from time to time all the names mentioned, even down to that of Soltikow; but he said he was known on all sides, and to many people, under these names, as a man of honour, and that if any calumniator were venturing to accuse him of nefarious transactions, he was ready to exculpate himself in the most satisfactory manner, as soon as he knew of what he was accused, and who the accuser was who dared to attack him. He steadily asserted that he had not told the Markgraf any lies with reference to his name and his family. The proofs of his origin, however, were in the hands of a person on whom he was dependent (i.e., the Emperor of Austria), a dependence which had brought on him, in the course of his life, the greatest espionage. . . . When he was asked why he had not informed the Markgraf about the different names under which he had appeared in so many different places, the Graf Tzarogy answered that he was under no obligations to the Markgraf, and that since he offended no one and did no person any harm, he would only give such personal information after and not before he had dealings with them. The Graf said he had never abused the confidence of the Markgraf; he had given his real name. . . . after this he still remained at Schwalbach." A little later the author of theparagraph just quoted remarks: "What resources M. de St. Germain had, to defray the necessary expenses of his existence, is hard to guess." 1
It appears curious to us that the writer knew so little of contemporary history. As we have seen, all the sons of Prince Ragoczy were amply provided for, and the proofs were even more accessible than they are in our day. He goes on to say in conclusion: "It would be an ungrateful task to declare that this man was a swindler; for this proofs are required and they are not to be had." This is truly an ingenious statement, but borders somewhat on libel; to speak of any one as a swindler without any proof is beyond the bounds of ordinary fairness, and it is especially incongruous in view of the final paragraph, which is as follows: "As long as the Graf had dealings with the Markgraf, he never asked for anything, and never received anything of the slightest value, and never mixed himself up in anything which did not concern him. On account of his extremely simple life, his wants were very limited; when he had money he shared it with the poor."
If we compare these words with those spoken of M. de St. Germain by his friend Prince Charles of Hesse, we shall find they are in perfect accord. The only wonder is that a writer
p. 24
who speaks such words of praise can even hint that his subject might be a "swindler." If such words can be rightly spoken of an "adventurer," then would it be well for the world if a few more of like sort could be found.
We shall find similar extraordinary contradictions in various writers as we proceed further with the life of M. de St. Germain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes
4:1 AKSAKOF, A., Psychische Studien, Monatliche Zeitschrift, xii., p. 430. Leipzig, 1885.
5:1 MAUVILLON, J., Geschichte Ferdinands, Herzog von Braunschweig-Luneberg, ii., p. 479. Leipzig, 1794.
5:2 GLEICHEN (E. H. Baron de), Souvenirs, Paris, 1868, p. 126.
7:1 GLEICHEN, Op. cit., p. 127.
7:2 D’ADHÉMAR (La Comtesse), Souvenirs sur Marie Antoinette, Archiduchesse d’Autriche, Reine de France, et sur la Cour de Versaille, Paris, 1836.
8:1 WEBER (Dr. Carl von), Aus vier Jahrhunderten. Mittheilungen aus dem Haupt-Staats-Archive, Zu Dresden, i., p. 312. Tauchnitz, Leipzig, 1857.
10:1 HESSE-CASSEL Karl, Prinz de), Mémoires de Mon Temps, p. 133. Copenhagen, 1861.
10:2 Rágóczy is the German spelling of this name. In Hungary it is written Rákóczy.
13:1 Op. cit., i., 45.
15:1 This is the son, mentioned by Prince Charles of Hesse, who was placed under the care of the last of the Medici.
19:1 Curiositäten der Literarisch-historischen Vor- and Mitwelt, pp. 285, 286. Weimar, 1818.
20:1 Told by M. Pyliaeff, member of the "Novoie Vremia," author of "Old Petersburg."
23:1 Curiositäten, op. cit., pp. 287, 289, 293. 294.
Adverse writers have made much mystery over the fact that the Comte de St. Germain was rich and always had money at his disposal; indeed, those writers who enjoyed calling him a "charlatan and a swindler" did not refrain also from hinting that his money must have been ill-gotten; many even go so far as to say that he made it by deceiving people and exercising an undue influence over them. If we turn to the old Archivarius already mentioned, we find some very definite information that not only shows
p. 15
Let us notice what Hezekiel 1 has to say on this point, for he has made some very careful investigations on the subject: "We are, in fact, inclined to think the Comte de St. Germain was the younger son of the Prince Franz-Leopold Ragoczy and the Princess Charlotte Amalia of Hesse-Wahnfried. Franz-Leopold was married
Saint-Germain's life and activities of an incentive to know each other, in all likelihood, respected as fellow countrymen. Ő maga sohasem beszélt származásáról, nemzetéről, vagy családjáról, mégis mindenki számára nyilvánvaló volt előkelő származása. He never talked about the origin, nemzetéről, or family, it was obvious to everyone privileged background. Valódi nevét senki sem ismerte. Nobody knew his real name. Nevezte magát Marquis de Montferrat-nak, Comte Bellamare-nak, Aymar-nak Velencéből, Chevalier Shoening-nek, Weldon-nak, Comte Soltikoff-nak, Gróf Tzarogy-nak és Ragozy (Ragotzy) hercegnek. Called himself the Marquis de Montferrat's, Comte's Bellamare, Aymar's Venice, Shoening Chevalier's, Weldon's, Soltikoff Comte's, Earl's and Tzarogy Ragozy (Ragotzy) Prince. Mások a szellemekkel foglakozó Cabalais gróffal, a rózsakeresztes Signor Gualdival, a máltai lovagrend fejével, Count Hompesch-sel, vagy egy szintén Saint-Germain nevű francia tábornokkal vélték azonosnak. Others dealing with the spirits Cabalais Count, Signor Gualdival the Rosicrucian, the head of the Order of Malta, Count Hompesch-sel, or a Saint-Germain, also called French generals thought the same. Sokáig tartotta magát az a nézet, hogy spanyol főnemes, Izabella királynő törvénytelen gyermeke, portugál zsidó kabbalista, de ma világszerte a legtöbben II. We have long adhered to the view that Spanish aristocrat, illegitimate son of Queen Isabella, Portuguese, Jewish Kabbalist, but today most of the world II. Rákóczi Ferenc erdélyi fejedelem törvénytelen (?) fiának tekintik. Ferenc Rákóczi prince of Transylvania, the illegal (?) Is considered his son. Ezzel szemben minden valószínűség szerint 1 Rákóczi fejedelem négy törvényes, feleségétől, Hesse-Wahnfried Sarolta Amália hercegnőtől született gyermekének egyike, Lipót György (bár ő állítólag egy éves korában meghalt), vagy az egy évvel később született György. By contrast, in all likelihood, a legitimate four Rákóczi prince, his wife, Charlotte Amalie of Hesse-Wahnfried Princess was born one child, Leopold George (though he supposedly died at the age of one), or a year later, George was born. A kutatók általában Lipót Görgyre (teljes nevén Rákóczi Lipót Lajos György József Antal) gondolnak, aki helyett feltehetően más gyermeket temettek el, míg őt külföldre csempészték – talán a bécsi udvar elől menekítve. The researchers generally Leopold George (born George Rákóczi Louis Leopold Joseph Anthony), they think, rather than possibly any other children who were buried while he smuggled abroad - maybe in the front yard menekítve Vienna. Más források szerint a gyermeket elrabolták. Other sources report that the child has been kidnapped. Nem nehéz rájönni, hogy a „Tzarogy” név is családnevének anagrammája. It is not difficult to figure out the "Tzarogy" name is an anagram surnames. Itáliában nevelkedett az utolsó Medici herceg pártfogása alatt, és a sienai egyetemen tanult – legalábbis egy késői barátja, a Hessen-Casseli Károly herceg szerint. Grew up in Italy under the patronage of the last Medici duke, and educated at the University of Siena - at least for a late friend of Prince Charles of Hesse-Casseli that. Mellesleg talán ideje lenne II. By the way, perhaps it would be time II. Rákóczi Ferenc (1676-1735) spirituális jelentőségét is felülvizsgálni. Ferenc Rákóczi (1676-1735) review of spiritual significance. Míg mi csak történelmi jelentőségét ismerjük, a Teozófiai Társaság hagyományai szerint 2 egyik alapítójukat, HS Olcott ezredest egy egyiptomi, egy indiai és egy magyar mester avatta be (szellemi úton). While we only know the historical significance of the tradition of the Theosophical Society two alapítójukat one, Colonel HS Olcott, an Egyptian, an Indian and a dedication to the Hungarian master (spiritual path). Előző életeiben Rákóczi már számos kiválóság testében élt. Rákóczi several previous lives of excellence, he lived in his body. Egy másik teozófus nagymester, CW Leadbeater is kapcsolatban állt ezzel a mesterrel és Rákóczi Mesternek nevezi. Theosophists another grandmaster, CW Leadbeater in contact with the master and Rákóczi was appointed Master. Szerintük rodostói halálát és temetését is csak megrendezték. Rodostói, according to the death and burial can only be staged. E ponton alakja összemosódik feltételezett fiával, Saint-Germainnel. At this point her son assumed the shape merge, Saint-Germainnel. A történelemben nem túl ritka, hogy valaki a megjátszott temetés után más néven él és dolgozik tovább. The history is not very rare that someone called after the funeral, played live and work on. Mikes Kelementől tudjuk, hogy amikor "holttestét" a házból kivitték, a török őrök csodálkozva jegyezték meg, hogy "Ez nem a ti uratok". Mikes Kelementől know that when a "dead bodies" have been exported out of the house, surprised by the Turkish guards said, "This is not your Lord". Van, aki amellett száll síkra, hogy a fejedelem maga volt Saint-Germain. Is there anyone who pleads that the prince himself was Saint-Germain. Való igaz, hogy a francia forradalom előtti zűrzavaros időkben Európának nagy szüksége volt hathatós szellemi erőkre (sajnos a csőcselék lázadását így sem sikerült elkerülni). It is true that the turbulent times of Europe before the French Revolution was a great need of strong intellectual powers (and unfortunately the mob so the rebellion could not be avoided). Az is igaz, hogy az említett hercegen kívül sehol sincs említés a fiatal Saint-Germainről, viszont ez ellen szól bizonyos von Gergy (Gregory?) hercegnő állítása, miszerint ő 1710-ben találkozott vele Velencében és ekkor 45-50 évesnek nézett ki, hiszen ekkor Rákóczi még itthon élt, a szabadságharc kellős közepén – ha csak nem játszott már akkor kettős szerepet. It is also true that the Prince is mentioned nowhere outside the Saint-Germainről young, but it argues against certain von Gergye (Gregory?) Princess's assertion that he had met him in Venice in 1710 and now 45-50 years old who looked as Rákóczi then still lived at home, in the middle of the War of Independence - only if you have not played a dual role.
Rákóczi fejedelem életének okkult oldalát a külföld jelenleg jobban ismeri, mint mi magunk. Rákóczi prince occult side of life in the rest of the world now knows him better than we do. Sokan úgy vélik, 1701-es szökése a bécsújhelyi börtönből sokkal inkább köszönhető különleges pszichikai képességeinek, mint a történelemből ismert Lehmann kapitány segítségének. Many consider the 1701 Wiener Neustadt prison escape but rather is due to a special psychic abilities, known to history as the help of Captain Lehmann. Erősen érdeklődött az alkímia iránt (talán művelte is), és minden valószínűség szerint kapcsolatban állt az akkori Európa titkos társaságaival – ne feledjük, a XVII-XVIII. Strong interest in alchemy for (probably also been cultivated), and most likely was related to the private companies in Europe at that time - remember, the seventeenth and eighteenth. század a mágia és miszticizmus reneszánsza volt a középkor szigora után! century, the magic and mysticism of the Middle Ages was a renaissance after strictness! Aligha lehet véletlen, hogy Rákóczi sárospataki várának „sub rosa” terméből indult ki a magyar jakobinusok szervezkedése, és a fejedelemnek is köze lehetett a magyarországi szabadkőműves és rózsakeresztes mozgalmak XVIII. Can hardly be coincidence that Sarospatak Rákóczi Castle "sub rosa" Hall of the Hungarian Jacobins began to organize, and the prince could also do with the Masonic and Rosicrucian movements in Hungary XVIII. századi megjelenéséhez. century appearance. A történetírás ennek a feltárásával is adósunk még. The history of this exploration is the debtor.
Mikes Kelemen (1690-1761) levelei szerint Saint-Germain egy ízben meg is látogatta Rodostóban a fejedelmet. Mikes Kelemen (1690-1761) leaves according to Saint-Germain is also a time to visit the prince Rodostóban. Eszerint nem lehetett azonos vele. This means that the same could not be with him. Olyan vélemény is napvilágot látott, hogy a gróf Rákóczinak a XIV. Reviews have been published so that the count of the Rákóczi XIV. Lajos testvére özvegyétől született gyermeke lett volna. Louis's brother's widow children was born. Figyelemre méltó tény lehet az is, hogy Rákóczi végrendeletében a szívét egy franciaországi kolostorba vitette (ahonnan a kolostor lebontásakor a becses ereklye eltűnt). Remarkable fact may also be a testament to the heart of Rákóczi had them taken to a convent in France (where the monastery is demolished the precious relic disappeared). Lehet, hogy sohasem fogjuk megtudni a teljes igazságot – bizonyára, mert ők is így akarták. May be that we will never know the whole truth - probably because they wanted to continue to do so.
Úgy számítják, hogy a legendás gróf 1710-ben, vagy '11-ben született, amennyiben Rákóczi Györggyel azonos, míg, ha Lipót György lenne, úgy 1696. It is calculated that in 1710 the legendary Count, or was born in '11, when George Rákóczi identical, but if George Leopold would be the 1696th május 28-án született. Born on May 28. Sajnos ennek is ellentmond a fentebb említett von Gergy hercegnő állítása. Unfortunately, this also contradicts the above assertion von Gergye princess. Bizonytalan a halála éve is. Uncertain of his death years ago. Bár az Eckenförde-i egyház anyakönyvében 1784-es halálozás van bejegyezve (február 24. dátummal), feltételezik, hogy nem őt temették el e név alatt, mert ezután még több helyen is feltűnt. Although the Church of Eckenförde anyakönyvében deaths registered in 1784 (dated February 24), assume that he is not buried under this name since then has appeared in several places. Az egyik utolsó említés 1822-ből származik, amikor felszállni látták egy Indiába induló hajóra, de az 1880-as években még látta egy rózsakeresztes barátja, akitől azzal búcsúzott, hogy elhagyja Európát, hogy a Himalája hegyei között pihenjen. One of the last mentioned dates from 1822, to take off when they saw a vessel bound for India, but the 1880s saw a Rosicrucian friend, with whom he bid farewell to leave Europe to relax in the mountains of the Himalayas. Feltételezik, hogy a Dalai Láma tanácsadója is volt. Assume that the Dalai Lama was also adviser. Nagy Frigyes porosz uralkodó szerint olyan ember, „aki soha nem hal meg és mindent tud”. Prussian ruler Frederick the Great as a man "who never dies and knows everything."
